These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods.
    Author: Lim SW, Hwang HS, Cho IS, Baek SH, Cho JH.
    Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Mar; 157(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 32115113.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned crowns and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-scanned crowns in various registration methods. METHODS: The samples consisted of 18 Korean adult patients, whose pretreatment intraoral scans and CBCT images were available. A 3-dimensional (3D) dental model was fabricated using a TRIOS intraoral scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and the OrthoAnalyzer program (version 1.7.1.4; 3Shape). After the CBCT image was taken, 3D volume rendering was performed to fabricate a 3D dental model using InVivo5 software (version 5.1; Anatomage, San Jose, Calif). Registration of the 3D dental crowns made from intraoral- and CBCT-scanned images was performed with Rapidform 2006 software (Inus Technology, Seoul, Korea) by a single operator. According to registration methods, 3 groups were established: individual-arch-total-registration group, individual-arch-segment-registration group, and bimaxillary-arch-centric-occlusion-registration group (n = 18 per group). After the amounts of shell/shell deviation were obtained, the mixed model analysis of variance and Bonferroni correction were performed. RESULTS: Although there was no significant difference in the registration accuracy between the individual-arch-total-registration group and individual-arch-segment-registration group, the bimaxillary-arch-centric-occlusion-registration group exhibited the lowest registration accuracy (maxillary and mandibular teeth, all 0.21 mm in the individual-arch-total-registration group; all 0.20 mm in the individual-arch-segment-registration group vs 0.26 mm and 0.25 mm in the bimaxillary-arch-centric-occlusion-registration group; P <0.001). Color-coded visualization charts exhibited that most red spots were localized on the occlusal surface of the posterior teeth in all 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: When considering the registration accuracy and convenience of the process, the individual-arch-total-registration method can be regarded as an efficient tool when integrating CBCT-scanned crown and intraoral-scanned crown.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]