These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Influence of the pump scheme on the output power and the intensity noise of a single-frequency continuous-wave laser. Author: Guo Y, Peng W, Su J, Lu H, Peng K. Journal: Opt Express; 2020 Feb 17; 28(4):5866-5874. PubMed ID: 32121801. Abstract: The influence of the pump scheme on the intensity noise of the single-frequency continuous-wave (CW) laser is investigated in this paper, which is implemented in a single-frequency CW Nd:YVO4 1064 nm laser by comparing the traditional 808 nm pumping scheme (TPS) to the direct 888 nm pumping scheme (DPS). Under the conditions that the lasers with TPS and DPS have the same cavity structure and the cavity mirrors, as well as the same operation state including the thermal lens of the laser crystals and the mode-matching between the pump laser mode and the laser cavity mode at the laser crystals, the output power of the laser with DPS is up-to 32.0 W, which is far higher than that of 21.1 W for the laser with TPS. However, the intensity noise of the DPS laser including resonant relaxation oscillation (RRO) frequency of 809 kHz, RRO peak amplitude of 31.6 dB/Hz above the shot noise level (SNL) and the SNL cutoff frequency of 4.2 MHz, respectively, is also higher than that of 606 kHz, 20.4 dB/Hz and 2.4 MHz for the TPS laser. After further analyses, we find that the laser crystal with high doping concentration and long optical length is employed for DPS laser in order to improve the pump laser absorption efficiency, which can simultaneously increase the dipole coupling between the active atoms and the laser cavity, and then results in a high RRO frequency with a large amplitude peak as well as a high SNL cutoff frequency of the laser.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]