These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Medical Histories of Control Subjects Influence the Biomarker Potential of Plasma Aβ in Alzheimer's Disease: a Meta-analysis.
    Author: Zhang S, Huang SY, An XB, Zeng L, Ai J.
    Journal: J Mol Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 70(6):861-870. PubMed ID: 32125624.
    Abstract:
    Whether blood amyloid-β (Aβ) could be a peripheral biomarker of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains in dispute. In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis with 19 citations searched from Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library database. Weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to estimate the effect size. We firstly analyzed the plasma Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in AD and control group subjects. However, only a lower level of plasma Aβ42 was figured out in AD group subjects with weak statistical significance (WMD 1.82; 95% CI 0.59, 3.06; P = 0.004; I2 = 84%). We considered that the medical histories of control subjects could influence the biomarker ability of plasma Aβ. Therefore, subgroup analyses were then carried out based on a new recruiting criterion for control subjects, defining as no afflictions of any Aβ-related diseases. Surprisingly, AD group subjects showed a significant decrease in plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio with low heterogeneity among studies (WMD 0.02; 95% CI 0.02, 0.02; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). Moreover, not only the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio but also Aβ42 and Aβ40 were indifferent between AD and pseudo-control subjects which might be afflicted with Aβ-related diseases. This meta-analysis demonstrated that medical histories of control subjects were interference factors impeding plasma Aβ to be a biomarker of AD.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]