These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Lung Cancer: Comparison Between Turbo Spin-Echo and Echo-Planar Imaging.
    Author: Wan Q, Lei Q, Wang P, Hu J, Zhang T, Yu D, Li X, Liang C.
    Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(3):334-340. PubMed ID: 32217894.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for evaluating lung cancer using single-shot turbo spin-echo (TSE) and single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in a 3T MR system. METHODS: Both single-shot TSE-DWI and single-shot EPI-DWI were scanned twice respectively for 15 patients with lung cancer. Distortion ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared between the 2 techniques. The Bland-Altman analysis was performed to analyze reproducibility between the parameters of TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI. Short-term test-retest repeatability, as well as interobserver agreement, was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULT: Turbo spin-echo DWI has lower signal-to-noise ratio and similar contrast-to-noise ratio compared with EPI-DWI. Distortion ratio of TSE-DWI was significantly smaller than that of EPI-DWI. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and true diffusivity (D) of TSE-DWI showed higher values than those of EPI-DWI. The Bland-Altman analysis showed unacceptable limits of agreement between these 2 sequences. Test-retest repeatability was good for ADC and D of EPI-DWI (CV, 14.11%-16.60% and 17.08%-19.53%) and excellent for ADC and D of TSE-DWI (CV, 4.8%-6.19% and 6.05%-8.71%), but relatively poor for perfusion fraction (f) and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) (CV, 25.95%-27.70% and 56.92%-71.84% for EPI, 23.67%-28.67% and 60.85%-70.17% for TSE). For interobserver agreement, both techniques were good to excellent in ADC and D (The lower limit of 95% confidence interval for ICC was almost all greater than 0.75), whereas D* and f had higher interobserver variabilities with D* of TSE-DWI showing poorest reproducibility (ICC, -0.27 to 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Lung DWI or IVIM using TSE could provide distortion-free images and improve the test-retest robustness of ADC and D as compared with EPI-DWI; however, it might exert a negative effect on perfusion parameter D*.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]