These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Migrant and resident female songbirds differ in gonadal response to upstream stimulation during seasonal sympatry.
    Author: Kimmitt AA, Webb AL, Greives TJ, Ketterson ED.
    Journal: Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Jul 01; 293():113469. PubMed ID: 32220572.
    Abstract:
    Timing of seasonal reproduction is driven by environmental cues acting on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Groups of individuals, or populations, of the same species can exhibit different phenology despite facing similar environmental cues or living in the same habitat (i.e., seasonal sympatry). The mechanisms giving rise to population-level differences in reproductive timing are not fully understood, particularly for females. We studied the dark-eyed junco, a songbird with migratory and sedentary (i.e., resident) populations that live in overlapping distributions during winter. In early spring, residents initiate breeding and associated behaviors, including territory establishment and formation of pair bonds, while migrants prepare to depart for their breeding grounds. We tested whether migrant and resident hormonal response to upstream hormonal stimulation differed during this time period. We collected blood from free-living females in early spring, and challenged them with repeated gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) injections to measure testosterone (T) response. We predicted that if migrants are less sensitive to upstream stimulation than residents, then they would exhibit lower response to the repeated GnRH challenges in migrants. We found that migrant and resident females both responded to an initial challenge by elevating T, but residents responded more robustly, indicating that the ovary plays a role in population-level differences in reproductive timing. We also found that migrants and residents attenuated their response to repeated challenges, and did not differ from one another in final T levels. We speculate that the explanation for the generally reduced T response after repeated GnRH injections need not be the same for migrants and residents, but possible explanations include suppression of upstream stimulation owing to negative feedback after the initial injection oraromatization of T to estradiol between sampling time points. We suggest that future studies experimentally explore how the ovarian response to upstream stimulation changes during the transition to reproduction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]