These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Brain magnetic resonance imaging features in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders patients with or without aquaporin-4 antibody in a Latin American population.
    Author: Silveira F, Pappolla A, Sánchez F, Marques VD, de Castillo IS, Tkachuk V, Caride A, Castillo MC, Cristiano E, Cruz CA, Diégues Serva GB, Dos Santos AC, Moreira CL, López PA, Patrucco L, Molina O, Pettinicchi JP, Carnero Contentti E, Rojas JI.
    Journal: Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2020 Jul; 42():102049. PubMed ID: 32251869.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: There is scarce evidence comparing the behavior in magnetic resonance (MRI) between positive and negative aquaporin-4 antibody neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (P-NMOSD and NNMOSD, respectively). The aim of this study was to describe and compare MRI features through a quantitative and qualitative analysis between P-NMOSD and NNMOSD patients in a cohort from Latin American (LATAM) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the MRI and medical records of NMOSD patients as defined by the 2015 validated diagnostic criteria, and with at least 3 years of follow-up from disease onset (first symptom). We included patients from Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela. To be included, NMOSD patients must have had AQP4-ab status measured by a cell-based assay. Brain MRIs were obtained for each participant at disease onset and every 12 months for 3 years. Demographics, clinical and MRI variables (T2 lesion volume [T2LV], lesion distribution, cortical thickness [CT] and percentage of brain volume loss [PBVL]) were analyzed and compared between groups (P-NMOSD; NNMOSD) at disease onset and follow-up. A multiple sclerosis (MS) control group of patients was also included. RESULTS: We included 24 P-NMOSD, 15 NNMOSD and 35 MS patients. No differences in age, gender and follow-up time were observed between groups. Nor were differences found in lesion distribution at disease onset or in brain volumes during follow-up between P-NMOSD and NNMOSD patients (T2LV = 0.43, CT = 0.12, PBVL p = 0.45). Significant differences were observed in lesion distribution at disease onset, as well as in brain volumes during follow-up between NMOSD and MS (T2LV = p<0.001, CT = p<0.001, PBVL p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Different MRI features were observed between MS and NMOSD. However, no quantitative nor qualitative differences were observed between P-NMOSD and NNMOSD, not allowing us to differentiate NMOSD conditions by MRI.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]