These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Glomerular filtration rate: comparison of simultaneous plasma clearance of 99mTc-DTPA and 51Cr-EDTA revisited.
    Author: Simonsen JA, Thilsing-Hansen K, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Gerke O, Andersen TL.
    Journal: Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2020 Sep; 80(5):408-411. PubMed ID: 32362172.
    Abstract:
    The issue of whether 99mTc-DTPA can replace 51Cr-EDTA for measurement of plasma clearance as a surrogate for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is of great relevance to daily clinical practice. Prompted by the shortage of 51Cr-EDTA we conducted a head-to-head comparison in patients attending our department for GFR determination. The two tracers (3.7 MBq of 51Cr-EDTA and 8 MBq of 99mTc-DTPA) were administered intravenously immediately after each other, and the standard number of blood samples were drawn. Fifty-four patients were enrolled. In 51 of these, single-sample measurement was performed with the following results: GFREDTA was 84.6 ± 23.3 mL/min, GFRDTPA was 84.2 ± 24.7 mL/min. The mean difference was 0.4 ± 2.8 mL/min, p = 0.32, and results based on the two tracers were highly correlated (r = 0.995). GFRDTPA exceeded GFREDTA at high GFR values (difference < 0 at GFREDTA >91.4 mL/min) and vice versa (difference > 0 at GFREDTA < 91.4 mL/min). However, differences fell within few GFR units that most often will have no clinical consequence. We therefore conclude that 99mTc-DTPA can replace 51Cr-EDTA for single-sample determination of GFR in a clinical setting.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]