These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Early adjustment of empirical antibiotic therapy of bloodstream infections on the basis of direct identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and Gram staining results. Author: Torres I, Pinto C, Oltra R, Pascual T, Carbonell N, Colomina J, Tormo M, Albert E, Aguilar G, Solano C, Navarro D. Journal: J Infect Chemother; 2020 Sep; 26(9):963-969. PubMed ID: 32386929. Abstract: INTRODUCTION: To assess the potential added value of rapid MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of bacteria in positive blood cultures to the information provided by Gram staining for adequate empirical antibiotic treatment adjustments in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study. In the pre-MALDI-TOF MS phase of the study antibiotic adjustments were made on the basis of Gram stain results, whereas in the MALDI-TOF MS phase they were based on information provided by Gram staining and MALDI-TOF MS results. No antimicrobial stewardship program for BSI was in place within the study period. Antibiotic regimens were categorized as correct, improvable or incorrect. RESULTS: Cohorts were matched for demographics, clinical characteristics of patients and bacterial species involved. Enterobacteriales were the most represented in both study periods (67%), followed by Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci. The number of patients receiving correct, improvable and incorrect empirical antibiotic treatments was comparable for both study periods (P = 0.45, P = 0.57, P = 0.87, respectively). The percentage of patients who ended up receiving correct treatment following modified empirical antibiotic regimens was significantly higher (P = 0.008) in the MALDI-TOF MS phase (27 patients/38.6%) than in the pre-MALDI-TOF MS phase of the study (11 patients/15.7%), although overall adequate coverage of the bacteria causing the infection was comparable across the study periods (90%). CONCLUSION: Gram stain results offer valuable information for early adjustment of empirical antibiotic therapies for BSI. Nevertheless, rapid identification of bacteria involved in BSI by MALDI-TOF MS provides added value to achieve this aim.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]