These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A machine learning-based approach to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging by conventional and cadmium-zinc telluride SPECT.
    Author: Cantoni V, Green R, Ricciardi C, Assante R, Zampella E, Nappi C, Gaudieri V, Mannarino T, Genova A, De Simini G, Giordano A, D'Antonio A, Acampa W, Petretta M, Cuocolo A.
    Journal: J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 29(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 32424676.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance of conventional (C) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-SPECT in a large cohort of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) and compared the diagnostic accuracy of the two systems using machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 517 consecutive patients underwent stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by both C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT. In the overall population, an excellent correlation between stress MPI data and left ventricular (LV) functional parameters measured by C-SPECT and by CZT-SPECT was observed (all P < .001). ML analysis performed through the implementation of random forest (RF) and k-nearest neighbors (NN) algorithms proved that CZT-SPECT has greater accuracy than C-SPECT in detecting CAD. For both algorithms, the sensitivity of CZT-SPECT (96% for RF and 60% for k-NN) was greater than that of C-SPECT (88% for RF and 53% for k-NN). CONCLUSIONS: MPI data and LV functional parameters obtained by CZT-SPECT are highly reproducible and provide good correlation with those obtained by C-SPECT. ML approach showed that the accuracy and sensitivity of CZT-SPECT is greater than C-SPECT in detecting CAD.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]