These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Reliability and Validity of the M-MALMAS Instrument to Assess Medication Adherence in Malay-Speaking Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
    Author: Lai PSM, Sellappans R, Chua SS.
    Journal: Pharmaceut Med; 2020 Jun; 34(3):201-207. PubMed ID: 32436200.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The English Malaysian Medication Adherence Scale (MALMAS) has been validated for assessing medication adherence of people with type 2 diabetes. However, Malay is the national language of Malaysia. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Malay MALMAS (M-MALMAS) in Malaysia. METHODS: Adults with type 2 diabetes, who could understand Malay, were recruited between May 2016 and February 2017 from a primary care clinic in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The M-MALMAS and the Malay version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) were administered at baseline to test for convergent validity. Four weeks later, the M-MALMAS was re-administered. Predictive validity of the M-MALMAS was assessed by correlating the medication adherence scores with levels of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). RESULTS: In total, 100 of 104 people agreed to participate (response rate = 96.2%). The overall Cronbach's α and McDonald's Ω for the M-MALMAS was 0.654 and 0.676, respectively (mean = 0.665). At test-retest, no significant difference was found for all items. The median total score interquartile range (IQR) of the M-MALMAS was 7.0 (6.0-8.0) and this was significantly correlated to the median total score of the Malay MMAS-8 [median (IQR) = 7.0 (5.8-8.0), p < 0.001]. HbA1c levels were significantly lower among participants who were adherent to their medications (score: 6-8) versus those who were non-adherent (score < 6, p = 0.018). The sensitivity and specificity of the M-MALMAS was 92% and 32.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The M-MALMAS was found to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing medication adherence of people with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. The M-MALMAS had a high sensitivity but its specificity was not as good.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]