These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Molecular epidemiology of imipenem resistance in invasive Haemophilus influenzae infections in Germany in 2016.
    Author: Lâm TT, Nürnberg S, Claus H, Vogel U.
    Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother; 2020 Aug 01; 75(8):2076-2086. PubMed ID: 32449913.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The carbapenems imipenem and meropenem play an important role in the empirical anti-infective treatment of critically ill patients. Carbapenem resistance in Haemophilus influenzae (Hi) has rarely been reported. OBJECTIVES: We provide prevalence data for resistance to carbapenems from laboratory surveillance of invasive Hi infections in Germany in 2016. METHODS: Phenotypic susceptibility testing against ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefotaxime and imipenem was carried out on 474 isolates from blood and CSF. The isolates were collected as part of the national laboratory surveillance programme. Imipenem-resistant strains were further tested for meropenem susceptibility. Molecular analysis was done by ftsI sequencing to detect mutations in PBP3, by acrR sequencing to detect alterations in the regulatory protein of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump and by MLST. RESULTS: No resistance to meropenem was detected. Cefotaxime resistance was rare (n = 3; 0.6%). Imipenem resistance was found in 64 strains (13.5%) using gradient agar diffusion and was confirmed in 26 isolates by broth microdilution (5.5%). Imipenem resistance occurred predominantly in Hi that were β-lactamase negative but ampicillin resistant and in those that were β-lactamase positive but nevertheless amoxicillin/clavulanate resistant. This finding suggested a β-lactamase-independent mechanism. Accordingly, sequence analysis of PBP3 identified previously described mutations. MLST of the imipenem-resistant strains, which were all non-typeable Hi, revealed a high diversity. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that imipenem, but not meropenem, resistance is frequent in Hi. It is likely to be supported by PBP3 mutations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]