MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Adrenal Adenomas versus Metastases: Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Energy Spectral CT Virtual Noncontrast Imaging and Iodine Maps.
Author: Nagayama Y, Inoue T, Oda S, Tanoue S, Nakaura T, Ikeda O, Yamashita Y.
Journal: Radiology; 2020 Aug; 296(2):324-332. PubMed ID: 32452733.
Abstract:
Background Dual-energy CT allows virtual noncontrast (VNC) attenuation and iodine density measurements from contrast material-enhanced examination, potentially enabling adrenal lesion characterization. However, data regarding diagnostic performance remain limited, and combined diagnostic values have never been investigated. Purpose To determine whether VNC attenuation, iodine density, and combination of the two allow reliable differentiation between adrenal adenomas and metastases. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with adrenal lesions who underwent unenhanced and portal venous phase dual-energy CT between January 2017 and December 2018. Unenhanced, contrast-enhanced, and VNC attenuation, as well as iodine density, were measured for each lesion. Agreement between unenhanced and VNC attenuation was assessed by using Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plot. The ratio of iodine density to VNC attenuation was calculated for lesions with positive VNC attenuation. Each parameter was compared between adenomas and metastases; diagnostic performance was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with sensitivity and specificity. Results A total of 149 patients (mean age, 65 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 89 men; 98 patients with 104 adenomas; 51 patients with 56 metastases) were evaluated. VNC attenuation showed strong positive correlation with unenhanced attenuation (r = 0.92) but resulted in overestimates of adenoma attenuation (mean bias, +11 HU; P < .001) and was less sensitive (P = .03) in the diagnosis of adenomas compared with unenhanced attenuation (sensitivity of 79% [81 of 102] [95% confidence interval {CI}: 70%, 87%] and specificity of 95% [53 of 56] [95% CI: 85%, 99%] versus sensitivity of 85% [87 of 102] [95% CI: 77%, 92%] and specificity of 96% [54 of 56] [95% CI: 88%, 100%], with thresholds of ≤29 HU and ≤22 HU, respectively). Contrast-enhanced attenuation had no discriminatory ability (AUC, 0.54; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.62). Iodine density yielded moderate performance (sensitivity of 78% [80 of 102] [95% CI: 69%, 86%] and specificity of 71% [40 of 56] [95% CI: 58%, 83%], with a threshold of ≥1.82 mg/mL). The iodine-to-VNC ratio was higher in adenomas than in metastases (mean, 14.5 vs 4.6; P < .001), with sensitivity of 95% (97 of 102; 95% CI: 89%, 98%) and specificity of 95% (53 of 56; 95% CI: 85%, 99%), with a threshold of 6.7 or greater. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT during the portal venous phase enabled accurate differentiation between adrenal adenomas and metastases by combining virtual noncontrast attenuation and iodine density. Virtual noncontrast imaging alone led to overestimates of adenoma attenuation, and iodine density alone had limited discriminatory utility. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hindman and Megibow in this issue.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]