These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Kidney retention of urea in sheep on a hypoprotein diet: study by retrograde perfusion of urea in the kidney pelvis].
    Author: Cirio A, Boivin R, Charlot A.
    Journal: J Physiol (Paris); ; 83(2):64-73. PubMed ID: 3251040.
    Abstract:
    In order to study the role of the renal pelvis on urea sparing in sheep fed low protein diets, the pelvis was perfused through the ureter with 1M and 3M urea solutions. Eight ewes were used: four on a regular diet (total nitrogen 188.7 g.kg-1 dry matter) and the other four on a low protein diet (total nitrogen 109.4 g.kg-1 dry matter). On each animal, perfusions were performed on one kidney; the other one was kept as a control. Fractional excretion of urea (TEu) and urea (Cu), inulin, para-aminohippurate and osmolar clearances, were determined during five experimental periods of 30 min each (T = control, 1M = perfusion with 1M urea solution, R1 = first period of recovery, 3M = perfusion with 3M urea solution, R2 = second period of recovery). 1. During control periods sheep on low protein diet have a greater capacity of urea retention than sheep on regular diet, under antidiuretic conditions (inulin U/P = 200). The following data (means +/- S.D.) are all reduced in animals on low protein diet: TEu by 36% (0.38 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.59 +/- 0.28 for normal protein sheep, p less than 0.05), Cu by 55% (0.50 +/- 0.19 vs. 1.15 +/- 0.49 ml.min-1.kg-1 for normal sheep, p less than 0.01) and amount of urea excreted by 80% (2.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7 mg.min-1 for normal sheep, p less than 0.01). 2. The linear regression analysis of the relationship between tubular reabsorption of urea and its filtered amount shows that the capacity of urea retention is significantly higher in low protein sheep and that the difference between the two groups is greater as the filtered amount increases. Following 1M and 3M perfusions, the capacity of urea reabsorption by the perfused kidneys is significantly decreased in low protein animals whereas there is no change in the normal ones. The result is that perfused kidneys of the low protein sheep increase the amount of urea excreted during these periods: urine concentration of urea (Uu) increases by 55% during R1 and by 144% during R2, TEu increases by 60% during R1 and by 147% during R2 and Cu increases by 40% during R1 and by 95% during R2, without any variation of urine flow rate. These changes could be understood, provided that an important transfer of the perfused urea to the renal medulla in the low protein sheep would reduce the concentration gradients which enhance urea passive reabsorption from the collecting ducts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]