These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Development of a Cadence-based Metabolic Equation for Walking.
    Author: Moore CC, Aguiar EJ, Ducharme SW, Tudor-Locke C.
    Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2021 Jan; 53(1):165-173. PubMed ID: 32555022.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop cadence-based metabolic equations (CME) for predicting the intensity of level walking and evaluate these CME against the widely adopted American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Metabolic Equation, which predicts walking intensity from speed and grade. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-five adults (21-84 yr of age) completed 5-min level treadmill walking bouts between 0.22 and 2.24 m·s, increasing by 0.22 m·s for each bout. Cadence (in steps per minute) was derived by dividing directly observed steps by bout duration. Intensity (oxygen uptake; in milliliters per kilogram per minute) was measured using indirect calorimetry. A simple CME was developed by fitting a least-squares regression to the cadence-intensity relationship, and a full CME was developed through best subsets regression with candidate predictors of age, sex, height, leg length, body mass, body mass index (BMI), and percent body fat. Predictive accuracy of each CME and the ACSM metabolic equation was evaluated at normal (0.89-1.56 m·s) and all (0.22-2.24 m·s) walking speeds through k-fold cross-validation and converted to METs (1 MET = 3.5 mL·kg·min). RESULTS: On average, the simple CME predicted intensity within ~1.8 mL·kg·min (~0.5 METs) at normal walking speeds and with negligible (<0.01 METs) bias. Including age, leg length, and BMI in the full CME marginally improved predictive accuracy (≤0.36 mL·kg·min [≤0.1 METs]), but may account for larger (up to 2.5 mL·kg·min [0.72 MET]) deviations in the cadence-intensity relationships of outliers in age, stature, and/or BMI. Both CME demonstrated 23%-35% greater accuracy and 2.2-2.8 mL·kg·min (0.6-0.8 METs) lower bias than the ACSM metabolic equation's speed-based predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ACSM metabolic equation incorporates a grade component and is convenient for treadmill-based applications, the CME developed herein enables accurate quantification of walking intensity using a metric that is accessible during overground walking, as is common in free-living contexts.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]