These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The association of waist-to-height ratio and other anthropometric measurements with subclinical atherosclerosis: Results from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).
    Author: Raele R, Lotufo PA, Bittencourt MS, de Jesus M Fonseca M, Goulart AC, Santos IS, Bensenor IM.
    Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Oct 30; 30(11):1989-1998. PubMed ID: 32624345.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To compare the performance of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference (WC) and Body-mass index (BMI) with subclinical atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The association of quintiles of anthropometric variables (1st as reference) - Odds ratio (OR); 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) - with Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC: 0 vs. >0; <100 vs. ≥100), Carotid Intima-Media Thickness (CIMT: <75th vs. ≥P75%) and as continuous variables in linear regression models in 4216 participants of ELSA-Brasil baseline. WHtR was associated with CAC >0 (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.16-2.93) and ≥100 after multivariate adjustment including BMI. WHR was associated with CAC >0 OR, 1.81 (95% CI, 1.25-2.82) and ≥100. BMI was not associated with CAC after further adjustment for WHtR, but was associated with CAC >0 after adjustment for WHR (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.02-1.94) or WC (1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.59). WHtR was not associated with CIMT after further adjustment for BMI. WHR was associated with CIMT ≥P75% (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.02-2.02) and in linear models (p < 0.0001). WC was associated with CIMT in linear models (p < 0.0001). BMI was associated to CIMT ≥P75% (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.53-2.54); and in linear models (P < 0.0001) after further adjustment for WHtR. After adjustment for WHR and WC the association of BMI with CIMT ≥P75% was respectively (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.70-3.13; and OR 2.39; 95% CI, 1.55-3.70); and in both linear models (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: WHtR was a good biomarker for subclinical atherosclerosis measured by CAC while BMI was a good biomarker for CIMT. WHR presented the best performance being associated with both biomarkers of subclinical atherosclerosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]