MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Outcomes After Transcatheter Reintervention for Dysfunction of a Previously Implanted Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve.
Author: Shahanavaz S, Berger F, Jones TK, Kreutzer J, Vincent JA, Eicken A, Bergersen L, Rome JJ, Zahn E, Søndergaard L, Cheatham JP, Weng S, Balzer D, McElhinney D.
Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul 13; 13(13):1529-1540. PubMed ID: 32646693.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate outcomes following transcatheter reintervention for degenerated transcatheter pulmonary valves (TPVs). BACKGROUND: TPV replacement (TPVR) with the Melody valve demonstrated sustained relief of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction and pulmonary regurgitation. METHODS: All patients who underwent TPVR with a Melody valve as part of 3 Medtronic-sponsored prospective multicenter studies were included. Transcatheter reinterventions included balloon dilation of the previously implanted Melody valve, placement of a bare-metal stent within the implanted TPV, or placement of a new TPV in the RVOT (TPV-in-TPV). Indications for reintervention, decisions to reintervene, and the method of reintervention were at physician discretion. All patients provided written informed consent to participate in the trials, and each trial was approved by local or central Institutional Review Boards or ethics committees at participating sites. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients who underwent TPVR were discharged from the implantation hospitalization with Melody valves in place. Transcatheter reintervention on the TPV was performed in 46 patients. The first transcatheter reintervention consisted of TPV-in-TPV in 28 patients (median 6.9 years [quartile 1 to quartile 3: 5.2 to 7.8 years] after TPVR), simple balloon dilation of the implanted Melody valve in 17 (median 4.9 years [quartile 1 to quartile 3: 4.0 to 6.0 years] after TPVR), and bare-metal stent placement alone in 1 (4.4 years after TPVR). There were no major procedural complications. Overall, 4-year freedom from explant and from any later RVOT reintervention after the first reintervention were 83% and 60%, respectively. Freedom from repeat RVOT reintervention was longer in patients undergoing TPV-in-TPV than balloon dilation (71% vs. 46% at 4 years; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: TPV-in-TPV can be an effective and durable treatment for Melody valve dysfunction. Although balloon dilation of the Melody valve was also acutely effective at reducing RVOT obstruction, the durability of this therapy was limited in this cohort compared with TPV-in-TPV.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]