These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Harmonization of two hs-cTnI methods based on recalibration of measured quality control and clinical samples.
    Author: Clerico A, Zaninotto M, Padoan A, Ndreu R, Musetti V, Masotti S, Prontera C, Passino C, Carlo Zucchelli G, Plebani M, Migliardi M.
    Journal: Clin Chim Acta; 2020 Nov; 510():150-156. PubMed ID: 32652160.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The study aim was to evaluate whether is possible to harmonize the results of two hs-cTnI methods using a recalibration procedure based on linear regression models and measured values of external quality assessment (EQA) and clinical samples. METHODS: A two-step experimental approach was used. The preliminary step was performed using 16 EQA samples. The harmonization procedure was then validated by using 2530 heparinized plasma samples collected by 12 Italian University and Regional Hospitals from apparently healthy volunteers and patients admitted to emergency department with cardiac diseases. Two hs-cTnI methods were tested: Architect Stat High Sensitive Troponin-I, and the Access hs-cTnI using DxI platform. Linear regression models based on mean values measured with the two hs-cTni methods were used. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the measurement bias between the two methods was found after recalibration procedure. The agreement between-methods improved of about 2.5 folds after recalibration, as assessed by reduction in mean CV values from 38.4% (SD 25.9%) before recalibration to 15.0% (SD 10.6%) after recalibration for hs-cTnI values ≤ 500 ng/L (n = 13, P = 0.0111 by non-parametric test for paired data). CONCLUSIONS: A recalibration procedure based on means of measured concentrations with hs-cTnI methods, which use monoclonal antibodies with similar binding characteristics, can be used to significantly reduce systematic bias and so to improve harmonization between methods. The results of this study can aid laboratorians and clinicians to better compare the concentrations respectively measured with the Architect and Access hs-cTnI methods.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]