These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Denoising Protein-Protein interaction network via variational graph auto-encoder for protein complex detection. Author: Yao H, Guan J, Liu T. Journal: J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Jun; 18(3):2040010. PubMed ID: 32698725. Abstract: Identifying protein complexes is an important issue in computational biology, as it benefits the understanding of cellular functions and the design of drugs. In the past decades, many computational methods have been proposed by mining dense subgraphs in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks (PINs). However, the high rate of false positive/negative interactions in PINs prevents accurately detecting complexes directly from the raw PINs. In this paper, we propose a denoising approach for protein complex detection by using variational graph auto-encoder. First, we embed a PIN to vector space by a stacked graph convolutional network (GCN), then decide which interactions in the PIN are credible. If the probability of an interaction being credible is less than a threshold, we delete the interaction. In such a way, we reconstruct a reliable PIN. Following that, we detect protein complexes in the reconstructed PIN by using several typical detection methods, including CPM, Coach, DPClus, GraphEntropy, IPCA and MCODE, and compare the results with those obtained directly from the original PIN. We conduct the empirical evaluation on four yeast PPI datasets (Gavin, Krogan, DIP and Wiphi) and two human PPI datasets (Reactome and Reactomekb), against two yeast complex benchmarks (CYC2008 and MIPS) and three human complex benchmarks (REACT, REACT_uniprotkb and CORE_COMPLEX_human), respectively. Experimental results show that with the reconstructed PINs obtained by our denoising approach, complex detection performance can get obviously boosted, in most cases by over 5%, sometimes even by 200%. Furthermore, we compare our approach with two existing denoising methods (RWS and RedNemo) while varying different matching rates on separate complex distributions. Our results show that in most cases (over 2/3), the proposed approach outperforms the existing methods.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]