These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain improves with radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy.
    Author: Koca H, Koca F, Icen YK, Demirtas AO, Aslan MZ, Sumbul HE, Coskun M, Erdoğdu T, Koc M.
    Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Sep; 43(9):947-957. PubMed ID: 32700763.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In our study, we aimed to evaluate left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) value in patients with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and to determine the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) procedure on LV-GLS. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 150 patients who underwent three-dimensional RFA with the diagnosis of PVCs were included. LV-GLS was measured with strain echocardiography in all patients before RFA and in the sixth-month control. Patients included in the study were grouped as LVEF <50% (Group I) and LVEF ≥50% (Group II) according to baseline LVEF, and patients within Group I were grouped as LVEF <50% (Group A) and LVEF ≥50% (Group B) according to the sixth-month LVEF. RESULTS: There were 39 patients (26%) with baseline LVEF <50%. In 14 (36%) of these patients, LVEF <50% was observed to continue during the sixth-month controls. Both the baseline and sixth-month LV-GLS values were significantly lower in Group I patients (<0.01). RFA treatment significantly increased both LVEF and LV-GLS (<0.01). It was found that age, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, LV diameters, and baseline LVEF were higher, and baseline LV-GLS level was lower in Group A patients (P < .01). Baseline LVEF and LV-GLS values were found to independently determine the patients in Group A (P < .01). In receiver operator characteristic analysis, when the limit value is accepted as 40% for baseline LVEF and 18% for baseline LV-GLS, it can determine Group A with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: LV-GLS decreases significantly in patients with reduced LVEF and PVCs. In these patients, RFA treatment significantly increases both LVEF and LV-GLS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]