These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detailed comparison of phenotype between male patients carrying variants in exons 1-14 and ORF15 of RPGR.
    Author: Zou X, Fang S, Wu S, Li H, Sun Z, Zhu T, Wei X, Sui R.
    Journal: Exp Eye Res; 2020 Sep; 198():108147. PubMed ID: 32702353.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare disease severity in detail between patients carrying variants in exons 1-14 and ORF15 of retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR). METHODS: Systematic next-generation sequencing data analysis, Sanger sequencing validation and segregation analysis were utilised to identify the pathogenic variants. Detailed ophthalmic examinations, including electroretinograms, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography were performed. Statistical analysis, including age adjustment and comparison, were performed based on cross-sectional level to compare disease severity between variants in the two RPGR variant groups. RESULTS: Sixty-two variants were identified in RPGR in 86 patients from 77 unrelated families. Twenty-nine (37.7%) had variants in RPGR-exons 1-14 (group 1) and 48 (62.3%) in RPGR-ORF15 (group 2). Eighty-four patients were diagnosed with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa and only two patients with cone-rod dystrophy. LogMAR visual acuity increased 0.035 and 0.022 each year on average in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Group 2 patients had better visual acuity with a mean logMAR difference of 0.4378, which is significant after age adjustment (P < 0.01). Neither the value of log (ellipsoid zone width) nor central retinal thickness was significantly correlated with variant grouping after considering the effect of the age variable (P = 0.56 and 0.40, respectively). Spherical refractive error did not differ significantly between the two variant groups (P = 0.17). Patterns of autofluorescence included a hyperfluorescent ring at the posterior pole, diffuse hyperfluorescence in the macular area, and dark macular autofluorescence with or without fovea hyperfluorescence. The age and proportion of fundus autofluorescence patterns between the two variant groups were significantly different (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with variants in exons 1-14 retained less visual acuity than patients with ORF15 variants and deteriorated faster. However, the ellipsoid zone widths, central retinal thickness and refractions were comparable between the two groups. Autofluorescence pattern relates to the age and the variant grouping.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]