These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Validation of American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk-Adapted Approach for Repeating Cytology in Benign Thyroid Nodules.
    Author: Maino F, Bufano A, Dalmazio G, Campanile M, Pilli T, Forleo R, Brilli L, Ciuoli C, Cantara S, Capezzone M, Cartocci A, Pacini F, Castagna MG.
    Journal: Thyroid; 2021 Mar; 31(3):446-451. PubMed ID: 32718278.
    Abstract:
    Background: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) ultrasound (US) risk stratification system is used to identify thyroid nodules in which fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) should be performed. In addition, this system is used to plan the long-term follow-up of patients with cytological benign thyroid nodules. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ATA US risk-adapted approach for repeating cytology in a large retrospective cohort of consecutive benign nodules with a second FNAC repeated after a median follow-up of 3.8 years (range 1.0-14.2 years). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 1010 thyroid nodules, with an initial benign cytological diagnosis, that underwent at least one repeat FNAC during the follow-up. Results: The rate of missed cancer in the whole cohort of thyroid nodules was 1.0%, and it increased along by the US risk class (0.8% in very low/low-risk, 1.2% in intermediate-risk, and 3.1% in high-risk nodules). The 2015 ATA US risk stratification system showed a very high accuracy in selecting nodules that did not require a second FNAC (negative predictive value = 99.1%). In addition, the rate of missed cancer significantly increased along with the increase in the US risk class in nodules that showed an enlarged volume (0.4% in the low-risk class and 6.4% in the high-risk class, p = 0.005), while it was very low and not associated with the US features in the subgroup of thyroid nodules that did not grow during the follow-up (p = 0.96). Conclusions: Our results confirm the accuracy of the ATA recommendations in selecting benign nodules for FNAC repetition during the follow-up. An additional cytological evaluation maybe avoided in benign thyroid nodules with low-risk US features, regardless of the evidence of growth during the follow-up. While the utility of the routine repeat FNAC in all benign nodules with high-risk US features remains to be defined, based on our results, repetition of FNAC seems to be indicated in nodules with evidence of growth during the follow-up.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]