These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: MR imaging of portal venous thrombosis: correlation with CT and sonography.
    Author: Zirinsky K, Markisz JA, Rubenstein WA, Cahill PT, Knowles RJ, Auh YH, Morrison H, Kazam E.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 3276086.
    Abstract:
    Fourteen patients with portal venous thrombosis (PVT) diagnosed by CT and/or sonography were studied with MR. Three of the 14 had portal hypertension. The MR findings were compared with those of eight patients with portal hypertension, but without CT or sonographic evidence of PVT. MR imaging showed portal venous thrombosis in all 14 PVT cases. Intraluminal thrombi of less than 5 weeks duration appeared markedly hyperintense relative to liver and muscle on both T1- and T2-weighted images. Older thrombi appeared hyperintense relative to liver and muscle in eight of 11 cases, but only on T2-weighted images. MR showed thrombi in 11% more portal vessels than did CT (MR = 30, CT = 27) and in 28% more vessels than did sonography (MR = 32, sonography = 25). MR also showed 24% more collateral vessels than did CT (MR = 31, CT = 25) and 50% more vessels than did sonography (MR = 33, sonography = 22). Third-echo images (echo time = 96 msec, repetition time = 1500-2150 msec) verified the presence of venous thrombi in 28 (93%) of 30 PVT vessels, and they differentiated flow-related intravascular signal from true thrombi in six (17%) of 36 portal hypertension vessels. We conclude that MR is a valuable tool for imaging portal vein thrombosis. MR is a good substitute for CT and can be more informative than sonography.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]