These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL-17, anti-12/23 and/or anti IL-23: Preliminary data of a real-life 16-week retrospective study.
    Author: Megna M, Fabbrocini G, Ruggiero A, Cinelli E.
    Journal: Dermatol Ther; 2020 Nov; 33(6):e14144. PubMed ID: 32761740.
    Abstract:
    Up until now, real-life experiences on the efficacy of risankizumab in patients who had previously failed anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23 or anti-IL23 inhibitor are not reported. We carried out a single-center, retrospective study, to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of patients under risankizumab who previously failed anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, or anti-IL23 inhibitors in a real-life setting. A total of eight patients were enrolled (four men and four women, mean age 45.8 ± 14.3 years). Five of them (62.5%) had received ustekinumab, seven (87.5%) at least one anti-IL17, and only one (12.5%) patient guselkumab. Secukinumab had been used in five (62.5%) cases, and ixekizumab in four (50.0%). Baseline mean PASI and BSA were 11.9 ± 5.5, and 22.9 ± 13.1, respectively, and 3.3 ± 1.7 and 7.5 ± 5 (P < .001 and P < .01) at week 16. Mean baseline NAPSI (18.0 ± 8.5) reduced to 7 ± 1.4 at week 16. Palmo-plantar and scalp area showed a reduction of 67.5% and 99.9% at week 16, respectively. No AEs was reported. Real-life preliminary data show risankizumab as a promising therapeutic option in patients who failed anti-IL-17, anti-IL12/23 and even the other anti-IL-23 counterpart, guselkumab.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]