These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Longitudinal hypertrophic and transcriptional responses to high-load eccentric-concentric vs concentric training in males.
    Author: Mallinson JE, Taylor T, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Billeter-Clark R, Constantin D, Franchi MV, Narici MV, Auer D, Greenhaff PL.
    Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2020 Nov; 30(11):2101-2115. PubMed ID: 32762021.
    Abstract:
    High-load eccentric training reputedly produces greater muscle hypertrophy than concentric training, possibly due to greater loading and/or inflammation. We quantified the temporal impact of combined maximal concentric-eccentric training vs maximal concentric training on muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), volume, and targeted mRNA expression (93 transcripts). Eight recreationally active males (24 ± 5 years, BMI 23.5 ± 2.5 kg/m2 ) performed 3 x 30 maximal eccentric isokinetic knee extensions and 2 x 30 maximal concentric knee extensions in dominant limb (ECC + CON) and 5 x 30 maximal concentric contractions (CON) in the non-dominant limb for 12 weeks (all 90°/s, 3x/wk). Quadriceps muscle CSA and volume were measured at baseline, 28 days (d), and 84 d in both limbs (3T MRI). Resting vastus lateralis biopsies were obtained from both limbs at baseline, 24 hours (h), 7, 28, and 84 d for mRNA abundance measurements (RT-PCR microfluidic cards). Work output was greater throughout training in ECC + CON vs CON (20.8 ± 9.7%, P < .001). Muscle CSA increased from baseline in both limbs at 28 d (CON 4.3 ± 2.6%, ECC + CON 4.0 ± 1.9%, both P < .001) and 84d (CON 3.9 ± 2.3%, ECC + CON 4.0 ± 3.1%, both P < .001), and muscle volume and isometric strength at 84 d (CON 44.8 ± 40.0%, P < .001; ECC + CON 36.9 ± 40.0%, P < .01), but no between-limb differences existed in any parameter. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis identified several cellular functions associated with regulation of muscle mass and metabolism as altered by both modalities at 24 h and 7 d, but particularly with ECC + CON. However, mRNA responses waned thereafter, regardless of modality. Initial muscle mRNA responses to training did not reflect chronic training-induced hypertrophy. Moreover, ECC + CON did not produce greater hypertrophy than CON, despite greater loading throughout and a differential mRNA response during the initial training week.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]