These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on heat-stressed dairy cows.
    Author: Al-Qaisi M, Horst EA, Mayorga EJ, Goetz BM, Abeyta MA, Yoon I, Timms LL, Appuhamy JA, Baumgard LH.
    Journal: J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9634-9645. PubMed ID: 32773305.
    Abstract:
    The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of supplementing a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP) on body temperature indices, metabolism, acute phase protein response, and production variables during heat stress (HS). Twenty multiparous lactating Holstein cows (body weight = 675 ± 12 kg; days in milk = 144 ± 5; and parity = 2.3 ± 0.1) were used in an experiment conducted in 2 replicates (10 cows/replicate). Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments: control diet (CON; n = 10) or the CON diet supplemented with 19 g/d of SCFP (n = 10; NutriTek, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA). Cows were fed their respective diets for 21 d before initiation of the study. The experiment consisted of 2 periods: thermoneutral (period 1; P1) and heat stress (period 2; P2). During P1 (4 d), cows were fed ad libitum and housed in thermoneutral conditions for collecting baseline data. During P2 (7 d), HS was artificially induced using an electric heat blanket (EHB; Thermotex Therapy Systems Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada). Cows were fitted with the EHB for the entirety of P2. Rectal temperature, respiration rate, and skin temperature were obtained twice daily (0600 and 1800 h) during both periods. Overall, HS increased rectal temperature, skin temperature, and respiration rate (1.4°C, 4.8°C, and 54 breaths/min, respectively) relative to P1, but no dietary treatment differences were detected. Compared with P1, HS decreased dry matter intake and milk yield (36 and 26%, respectively), and the reductions were similar between dietary treatments. Relative to P1, HS increased milk fat content and milk urea nitrogen (17 and 30%, respectively) and decreased milk protein and lactose contents (7 and 1.4%, respectively). Overall, HS increased (52%) plasma cortisol concentrations of CON, but circulating cortisol did not change in SCFP-fed cows. Heat stress increased circulating lipopolysaccharide binding protein and serum amyloid A (SAA; 2- and 4-fold, respectively), and SCFP supplementation tended to decrease peak SAA (∼33%) relative to CON cows. Overall, although HS did not influence circulating white blood cells and neutrophils, SCFP increased circulating white blood cells and neutrophils by 9 and 26%, respectively, over CON in P2. In conclusion, HS initiated an acute phase protein response and feeding SCFP blunted the cortisol and SAA concentrations and altered some key leukocyte dynamics during HS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]