These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prospective study comparing imipenem-cilastatin with clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of serious surgical infections.
    Author: Hackford AW, Tally FP, Reinhold RB, Barza M, Gorbach SL.
    Journal: Arch Surg; 1988 Mar; 123(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 3277587.
    Abstract:
    Surgical infection remains a leading cause of hospital morbidity and mortality. We compared the efficacy and toxicity of imipenem-cilastatin sodium in 32 patients with that of clindamycin phosphate and gentamicin sulfate in 25 patients. In the imipenem-cilastatin group, 87.5% had a favorable outcome, with a 12.5% failure rate and 13 adverse reactions. In the clindamycin-gentamicin group, 80% had a favorable outcome, with a 20% failure rate and ten adverse reactions. Two significant superinfections with Pseudomonas and Candida were noted in patients treated with impenem-cilastatin. Each group had one case of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis. Cost analysis showed no differences between treatment arms, except in the appendicitis subgroup. For serious surgical infections, single-agent therapy with imipenem-cilastatin appears to be as efficacious as combination therapy with clindamycin and gentamicin.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]