These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Psychometric properties comparison between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in the general Thai population.
    Author: Kangwanrattanakul K, Parmontree P.
    Journal: Qual Life Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3407-3417. PubMed ID: 32780315.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Evidence for the EQ-5D-5L's psychometric properties in the general Thai population is limited. This study aimed to compare ceiling effect, discriminatory power, response redistribution, validity, reliability between the EQ-5D-5L (5L) and the EQ-5D-3L (3L) in the general Thai population. METHODS: 1200 participants were randomly selected. The Shannon index ([Formula: see text] and Shannon evenness index ([Formula: see text] determining discriminatory power of both EQ-5D versions in each dimension were compared. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using weighted kappa (k) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Validity was evaluated by correlations between similar dimensions of the EQ-5D, WHOQOL-BREF, and SF-12v2 and known-groups validity. The ceiling effects for the 3L and for the 5L were compared. RESULTS: The 5L had lower ceiling effects than the 3L (49.08% vs 57.17%, p < 0.01). [Formula: see text] was higher for the 5L than for the 3L, but [Formula: see text] showed otherwise. Moderate correlations were detected between similar dimensions of the EQ-5D and the WHOQOL-BREF and SF-12v2. ICCs and k of the 3L were slightly higher than those of the 5L (ICCs: 0.78 vs 0.71) and (k: 0.42-0.63 vs 0.48-0.61), respectively. Older, female participants and those with comorbidities reported a lower utility index for both versions. CONCLUSION: Evidence supported use of both EQ-5D versions in the general Thai population. The 5L had better ceiling effects and discriminant activity, while it showed comparable known-groups validity with the 3L. Nevertheless, evidence is limited for the superiority of reliability between these two versions, so more future research is required to investigate it.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]