These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Interactive effect of susceptibility-diffusion mismatch and recanalization status on clinical outcome in large vessel occlusion stroke.
    Author: Jiang H, Zhang Y, Pang J, Qiu HC, Liu AF, Li C, Zhou J, Jin M, Man F, Jiang WJ.
    Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Sep; 29(9):105072. PubMed ID: 32807474.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interactive effect of susceptibility-diffusion mismatch and recanalization status on clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. METHODS: In this prospective study, consecutive ischemic stroke patients admitted within 24 h from symptom onset underwent emergency multimodal MRI at admission, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA). Patients with large vessel occlusion within the anterior circulation were recruited. Follow-up MRI was performed within 24 h after recanalization therapy (intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular therapy, or both). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the interaction between SWI-DWI mismatch score and recanalization status on clinical outcome. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled. A multiplicative interaction between SWI-DWI mismatch score and recanalization status on clinical outcome was observed (P=0.037). The interaction term "SWI-DWI mismatch score × successful recanalization" was significantly associated with favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.162; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.046-4.468). Stratified analysis showed that the likelihood of favorable outcome increased with the increase of SWI-DWI mismatch score in the successful recanalization group (OR, 2.140; 95% CI, 1.376-3.326), while there was no significant relationship between SWI-DWI mismatch score and clinical outcome in the unsuccessful recanalization group (OR, 1.212; 95% CI, 0.933-1.574). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of SWI-DWI mismatch and recanalization status on clinical outcome were realized through their interaction. In anterior circulation stroke due to large vessel occlusion, patients with both high SWI-DWI mismatch scores and successful recanalization were more likely to achieve a favorable outcome, while patients with unsuccessful recanalization, or with successful recanalization but low SWI-DWI mismatch scores, were less likely to have a good prognosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]