These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prognosis Prediction in Initially Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Multiecho Dixon Imaging.
    Author: Jo A, Jung JY, Lee SY, Lee SE, Park H, Lee SE, Min CK.
    Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 32812318.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Multiparametric MRI provides complementary information for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of prognostic factors of MM and parameters derived from intravoxel-incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) and multiecho (ME) Dixon. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: In all, 78 MM patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: T1 -weighted turbo spin-echo sequences (TSE), IVIM-DWI, ME 3D gradient echo sequence with multistep adaptive fitting at 3T. ASSESSMENT: The region of interest (ROI) on the vertebral body was independently measured on four parametric maps (Dslow , Dfast and perfusion fraction [f], and proton-density fat-fraction [Ff] maps) by two readers. All patients were categorized into three groups based on the International Staging System (ISS). STATISTICAL TESTS: Three groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the advancement of disease (early vs. advanced). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to find the deterministic parameters. RESULTS: Dslow and Ff were significantly different among ISS-1 (n = 38), ISS-2 (n = 22), and ISS-3 (n = 18) groups in both readers: 0.36, 0.41, and 0.58 × 10-3 mm2 /s for Dslow (P < 0.05), and 46%, 30%, and 15% for Ff (P < 0.05) in reader 1; 0.34, 0.41, and 0.58 × 10-3 mm2 /s for Dslow (P < 0.05), 43%, 27%, and 13.2% for Ff (P < 0.05) in reader 2, respectively. Dfast between ISS-3 and the other groups was significantly different in one reader only: 2.03, 2.29, and 2.85 × 10-3 mm2 /s (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in f among the groups in both readers. Logistic regression by stepwise selection indicated Ff as the single most significant factor for differentiating early and advanced stages of MM with an accuracy of 76% and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (P < 0.05). PCA revealed Ff, and Dslow as the deterministic parameters, with a cumulative proportion of 0.84. DATA CONCLUSION: D slow and Ff are associated with the prognostic factor of MM. Level of Evidence 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 5. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2021;53:491-501.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]