These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Development of a dispersive solid phase extraction method based on in situ formation of adsorbent followed by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for extraction of some pesticide residues in fruit juice samples.
    Author: Farajzadeh MA, Sattari Dabbagh M.
    Journal: J Chromatogr A; 2020 Sep 13; 1627():461398. PubMed ID: 32823103.
    Abstract:
    A new mode of dispersive solid phase extraction based on in situ formation of adsorbent in aqueous phase has been introduced as an efficient method for the extraction of some pesticide residues in fruit juice samples. In this method, polycarbonate which is an inexpensive polymer is used as an adsorbent for the first time. The method is followed by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for more enrichment of the analytes. In the present study, a proper amount of the polymer is dissolved in N,N-dimethyl formamide and the obtained solution is injected into an aqueous phase containing the analytes. After injection, polycarbonate particles are formed and adsorbed the analytes. Then, the adsorbent is separated from the aqueous solution and eluted by acetone. The obtained acetone phase is mixed with 1,1,1-trichloroethane and the mixture is dispersed into deionized water and a cloudy solution is formed. Ultimately, after centrifugation, the obtained sedimented phase containing the extracted analytes is injected into gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. In the proposed method, the adsorbent synthesis step, which often is a time-consuming, expensive, and laborious step in most adsorbent-based sample preparation methods, has been removed. Moreover, there is no need for sonication or vortex agitation. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the relative standard deviation was equal or less than 7% for intra- (n = 6) and inter-day (n = 5) precisions at a concentration of 50 µg L-1 of each pesticide. The limits of detection and quantification were in the ranges of 0.34-1.2 and 1.1-4.0 µg L-1, respectively. In addition, extraction recoveries and enrichment factors varied in the ranges of 44-89% and 220-443, respectively.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]