These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times daily.
    Author: Wieland M, Virkler PD, Weld A, Melvin JM, Wettstein MR, Oswald MF, Geary CM, Watters RD, Lynch R, Nydam DV.
    Journal: J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9548-9560. PubMed ID: 32828498.
    Abstract:
    The objectives were to study the effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking characteristics in dairy cows. In a randomized controlled crossover study, 130 Holstein cows milked 3 times daily were assigned to treatment and control groups. Premilking udder preparation for the treatment group consisted of: (1) predipping with 1% iodine, (2) sequential forestripping of 3 streams of milk per quarter, (3) wiping of teats, and (4) attachment of the milking unit. Premilking udder preparation for the control group was identical except that the forestripping step was omitted. The mean tactile stimulation durations were 16 s and 7 s for the treatment and control group, respectively. The time spent from first tactile stimulus (either forestripping or wiping of teats) to milking unit attachment was kept consistent at 90 s for both groups. The study lasted for 14 d with 2 periods, each consisting of a 2-d adjustment time followed by 5 d of data collection. Machine milking-induced short-term changes to the teat tissue were assessed by palpation and visually. The following milking characteristics were assessed with electronic on-farm milk meters: milk yield (MY), milking unit-on time (MUOT), 2-min MY (2MIN), and time spent in low milk flow rate (LMF). Generalized linear mixed models were used to describe the effect of treatment on the outcome variables. The odds of machine milking-induced short-term changes to the teat tissue were lower for cows that received forestripping compared with cows that were not forestripped (odds ratio = 0.31; 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.42). Least squares means (95% confidence interval) for cows that were forestripped and animals that were not forestripped, respectively, were 12.7 (12.2-13.2) and 12.7 (12.2-13.2) kg for MY and 6.1 (5.8-6.4) and 5.6 (5.3-5.9) kg for 2MIN. There was an interaction between treatment and MY for LMF. Time spent in LMF for cows that were forestripped and received no forestripping, respectively, were 18 (17-20) and 24 (23-26) s for a MY level of 10 kg; and 13 (12-14) and 15 (14-16) s for a MY level of 15 kg. The effect of treatment on MUOT was modified by parity. Milking unit-on times for animals in first, second and third or greater lactation, respectively, were 230 (219-243), 249 (236-262), and 260 (249-272) s for cows that were forestripped, and 245 (232-258), 252 (239-266), and 268 (257-281) s for cows that received no forestripping. In this study, cows that were forestripped had shorter MUOT, higher 2MIN, lower LMF, and lower odds of exhibiting changes to the teat tissue after machine milking. We conclude that wiping of teats during premilking udder preparation alone and omitting forestripping of teats without compensating for the loss in stimulation time may not provide sufficient tactile stimulation to elicit the cows' maximum physiological milk-ejection capacity. This can aggravate the adverse effects of vacuum-induced forces on teat tissue during machine milking, diminish animal well-being, and possibly affect udder health.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]