These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with femoropopliteal bypass surgery in treating femoropopliteal lesions.
    Author: Kavala AA, Kuserli Y, Turkyilmaz S.
    Journal: Vascular; 2021 Apr; 29(2):260-269. PubMed ID: 32838692.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To compare drug (paclitaxel)-coated balloon angioplasty with femoropopliteal bypass surgery in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed between January 2015 and January 2019, covering a four-year period. All subjects who underwent femoropopliteal bypass surgery and drug-coated balloon angioplasty over a four-year period were evaluated. The subjects' demographic characteristics, lesion characteristics, treatment outcomes and disease-free survival were collected. Subjects were divided into the femoropopliteal bypass group (Group A) and the drug-coated balloon angioplasty (Group B) group. RESULTS: In total, 220 subjects were enrolled. Both Group A and Group B consisted of 110 subjects. The proportion of patients with a claudication distance between 0 and 50 m was significantly higher in Group A, and the proportion of patients with a claudication distance between 50 and 100 m was significantly higher in Group B (p = 0.001). In terms of the Rutherford levels, moderate claudication was significantly higher in Group B, and severe claudication was significantly higher in Group A (p = 0.001). The lesion length for the subjects in Group A was significantly longer than that in Group B (24.61 ± 2.79 mm for Group A and 18.59 ± 3.95 mm for Group B, p = 0.001). The stenosis degree in Group A was also significantly higher than that in Group B (96.82 ± 4.32% for Group A and 94.85 ± 4.55% for Group B, p = 0.001). The duration of the procedure, duration of hospitalization and rate of bleeding in Group A were significantly higher than those in Group B. The incidence of overall morbidity and reintervention rates in Group B were significantly higher than that in Group A. The preoperative ankle brachial index values of the subjects in Group B were statistically significantly higher than those in Group A (0.56 ± 0.08 for Group A and 0.61 ± 0.08 for Group B, p = 0.001). The change in the ankle brachial index measurement of the subjects in Group A with respect to the preprocedure value was significantly greater than that in Group B (p = 0.001). For primary patency, there was a significant difference between the groups in the distribution of the duplex ultrasound results at the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month control points (p = 0.001). At all control points, Group A had better primary patency rates, whereas the secondary patency rates did not differ. In total, among the 220 patients, 125 (56.8%) were disease free, and 95 (43.2%) experienced recurrence. The mean disease-free survival times for Group A and Group B were 10.45 ± 0.28 months and 9.11 ± 0.37 months, respectively. The disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in Group A (p = 0.001, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Femoropopliteal bypass resulted in better disease-free survival rates than drug-coated balloon angioplasty and serves as an effective modality for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]