These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Provider-adolescent discussion and provider education about asthma triggers during pediatric visits: results of a randomized trial.
    Author: Sleath B, Carpenter DM, Davis SA, Sayner R, Lee C, Loughlin CE, Garcia N, Reuland DS, Tudor G.
    Journal: J Asthma; 2021 Dec; 58(12):1565-1573. PubMed ID: 32867560.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: We examined how an asthma question prompt list with video intervention influenced discussion of and provider education about asthma triggers. METHODS: English or Spanish-speaking adolescents ages 11-17 with persistent asthma and their caregivers were enrolled from four pediatric clinics. Adolescents were randomized to the intervention or usual care groups. Adolescents in the intervention group watched the video on an iPad and then completed a one-page asthma question prompt list before their visits. All visits were audio-recorded. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to predict the number of trigger areas discussed and the number of areas providers educated adolescents about during visits. RESULTS: Forty providers and 359 patients participated. Triggers were discussed during 89% of intervention group visits and 81% of usual care visits; providers educated adolescents about triggers during 59% of intervention group visits and 46% of usual care visits. More triggers were significantly more likely to be discussed and providers educated about more trigger areas during visits of adolescents in the intervention group and when adolescents asked one or more questions during visits. More trigger areas were significantly more likely to be discussed if the adolescent was White and male. Providers were significantly more likely to educate adolescents whose family spoke Spanish at home about more trigger areas than adolescents who spoke English at home. CONCLUSIONS: More trigger areas were significantly more likely to be discussed and providers educated about more trigger areas during visits of adolescents who received the intervention and when adolescents asked one or more questions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]