These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Results of treatment of children with acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) according to the ALL V protocol of the Netherlands Working Group on Leukemia in Children].
    Author: van der Does-van den Berg A, van Wering ER, Suciu S, Solbu G, Rammeloo JA, de Koning J, van Zanen GE.
    Journal: Tijdschr Kindergeneeskd; 1988 Apr; 56(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 3287685.
    Abstract:
    The Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group performed a phase III study (Study ALL V) to evaluate the effectiveness of addition of rubidomycin to induction treatment with vincristine, prednisone and L-asparaginase in children (0-15 years) with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: WBC less than 50.10(9)/l, absence of mediastinal mass and/or cerebromeningeal leukemia. Furthermore, the influence of some initial patient- en disease-characteristics on the outcome was analysed. Between May 1979 and December 1982 240 patients entered into the study and were randomized into 2 groups: group A (n = 122) received induction treatment with vincristine, prednisone and L-asparaginase; group B (n = 118) received induction treatment with vincristine, prednisone, L-asparaginase and rubidomycin. All patients received cranial irradiation (doses adjusted to age) and intrathecal methotrexate, followed by maintenance treatment with 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate for 5 weeks, alternated with vincristine and prednisone for 2 weeks, up to 24 months. Complete remission rate was 94% in both groups. Event-free survival at 5 years after diagnosis was higher in group B (62% +/- 4.6%) than in group A (54.2% +/- 4.6%) but the difference was not significant. A higher initial WBC, age greater than or equal to 10 years and a positive acid phosphatase reaction of the leukemic cells were unfavorable prognostic factors (p less than 0.01). Sex, FAB-morphology, immunophenotype and place of treatment (center or general hospital) were not significant factors.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]