These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of abdominal hemodynamics through compressed sensing accelerated functional imaging.
    Author: Yoshimaru D, Araki Y, Maruyama C, Shirota N, Tajima Y, Murata K, Nickel D, Saito K.
    Journal: Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Nov; 73():186-191. PubMed ID: 32890672.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the imaging characteristics of the volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) using compressed-sensing (CS) acceleration (CS-VIBE) with the conventional sequence relying on parallel imaging to assess the potential use of CS-VIBE as a functional imaging technique for upper abdominal haemodynamics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (30 men, 27 women) suspected of having a hepatic disease underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver, including a dynamic contrast-enhanced study. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid was used as the contrast agent. MRI data of two multi-phase breath-hold exams were used for intra-individual comparisons. The VIBE and CS-VIBE were performed on different days. Image quality in both sequences was qualitatively assessed by three experienced radiologists. Moreover, the contrast ratio (CR) of the aorta, portal vein, liver and pancreas to muscle tissue were measured as a quantitative assessment. For the CS-VIBE, a five-phase time-intensity curve (TIC) was created to evaluate haemodynamics. The measurement area included the pancreas, common hepatic artery, portal vein and superior mesenteric vein. The ratio of that area to the muscle tissue in the same cross section was used to create the TICs. RESULTS: The qualitative assessment showed that artefacts were significantly different between the VIBE and CS-VIBE sequences. This finding indicated that the conventional VIBE had fewer artefacts. The CR was significantly higher for the CS-VIBE than for the VIBE images in all phases (p < 0.001). An evaluation of haemodynamics compared with those obtained by CT angiography showed almost the same temporal characteristics in the common hepatic artery, portal vein and superior mesenteric vein signals as those in a previous study. CONCLUSION: Compared with the conventional VIBE, the CS-VIBE had significantly higher temporal resolution and higher image contrast. The temporal resolution of the CS-VIBE was sufficient for viewing abdominal haemodynamics. If the remaining limitation of acquisition speed for dynamic MRI can be adequately addressed, we believe that CS-VIBE functional images with high-contrast haemodynamics will be very useful in clinical practise.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]