These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Oral and IUD emergency contraception provision among a national sample of obstetrician-gynecologists. Author: Castleberry NM, Stark L, Schulkin J, Grossman D. Journal: Contraception; 2020 Dec; 102(6):406-408. PubMed ID: 32898546. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' practices related to emergency contraception (EC). We performed a survey of ACOG Fellows and Junior Fellows between August 2016 and March 2017. RESULTS: The final sample was 1280 respondents (52.2% response rate). The majority (84%) reported offering at least one form of EC, with 18% offering ulipristal acetate and 29% offering copper IUDs. Fifty-seven percent of those offering IUDs reported recommending them in the last 12 months. Few had placed IUDs for EC. Half of ob-gyns reported not recommending copper IUDs because patients rarely seek EC. CONCLUSION: Many obstetrician-gynecologists are not offering the most effective forms of EC. IMPLICATIONS: Both patients and clinicians need more outreach about the most effective methods of emergency contraception.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]