These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Noise reduction with cross-tracer and cross-protocol deep transfer learning for low-dose PET.
    Author: Liu H, Wu J, Lu W, Onofrey JA, Liu YH, Liu C.
    Journal: Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep 14; 65(18):185006. PubMed ID: 32924973.
    Abstract:
    Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of reducing noise with deep learning-based methods for low-dose fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). This work aimed to investigate the feasibility of noise reduction for tracers without sufficient training datasets using a deep transfer learning approach, which can utilize existing networks trained by the widely available FDG datasets. In this study, the deep transfer learning strategy based on a fully 3D patch-based U-Net was investigated on a 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) dataset using single-bed scanning and a 68Ga-DOTATATE dataset using whole-body scanning. The datasets of 18F-FDG by single-bed scanning and whole-body scanning were used to obtain pre-trained U-Nets separately for subsequent cross-tracer and cross-protocol transfer learning. The full-dose PET images were used as the labels while low-dose PET images from 10% counts were used as the inputs. Three types of U-Nets were obtained: a U-Net trained by FDG dataset, a pre-trained FDG U-Net fine-tuned by another less-available tracer (FMISO/DOATATE), and a U-Net completely trained by a large number of less-available tracer datasets (FMISO/DOATATE), used as the reference U-Net. The denoising performance of the three types of U-Nets was evaluated on single-bed 18F-FMISO and whole-body 68Ga-DOTATATE separately and compared using normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and relative bias of region of interest (ROI). For cross-tracer transfer learning, all the U-Nets provided denoised images with similar quality for both tracers. There was no significant difference in terms of NRMSE and SNR when comparing the former two U-Nets with the reference U-Net. The ROI biases for these U-Nets were similar. For cross-tracer and cross-protocol transfer learning, the pre-trained single-bed FDG U-Net fine-tuned by whole-body DOTATATE data provided the most consistent images with the reference U-Net. Fine-tuning significantly reduced the NRMSE and the ROI bias and improved the SNR when comparing the fine-tuned U-Net with the U-Net trained by single-bed FDG only (NRMSE: 96.3% ± 21.1% versus 120.6% ± 18.5%, ROI bias: -10.5% ± 13.0% versus -14.7% ± 6.4%, SNR: 4.2 ± 1.4 versus 3.9 ± 1.6, for fine-tuned U-Net and the U-Net trained by single-bed FDG, respectively, with p < 0.01 in all cases). This work demonstrated that it is feasible to utilize existing networks well-trained by FDG datasets to reduce the noise for other less-available tracers and other scanning protocols by using the fine-tuning strategy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]