These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Head-to-head comparison of the hybrid tracer indocyanine green-99mTc-nanocolloid with 99mTc-Senti-Scint using sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computer tomography in melanoma.
    Author: Rietbergen DDD, Meershoek P, KleinJan GH, Donswijk M, Valdés Olmos RA, van Leeuwen FWB, Klop MWMC, van der Hage JA.
    Journal: Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Oct; 41(10):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 32925825.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The hybrid tracer indocyanine green (ICG)-Tc-nanocolloid has been introduced for sentinel node imaging. However, until now, a comparison of this tracer with other radiocolloids with a larger particle size has not been effectuated. Based on a head-to-head evaluation in patients with melanoma, we have compared ICG-Tc-nanocolloid (particle size 5-80 nm) with Tc-Senti-Scint (particle size 100-600 nm) to establish differences in drainage pattern and sentinel node localization using lymphoscintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computer tomography (SPECT-CT) in melanoma patients scheduled for sentinel node biopsy. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (mean age: 56.9 years, range: 25-79 years) with a melanoma scheduled for SLN biopsy prior to (re)excision of the primary lesion (scar) were prospectively included following a two-day procedure. The first day, after Tc-Senti-Scint injection in four intradermal depots around the primary lesion or scar, early/delayed lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT-CT images were acquired. The injection sites were marked. The second day, after assessing lymph node radioactivity using planar scintigraphy, ICG-Tc-nanocolloid was injected at the previously marked skin points and imaging was performed. The paired planar and SPECT-CT images of both tracers were evaluated with respect to drainage patterns, SLN visualization and non-SLN appearing. RESULTS: Twenty-four out of 25 patients were evaluable. SLN visualization on a patient basis was 100% for ICG-Tc-nanocolloid and 96% for Tc-Senti-Scint, whereas uptake in non-SLNs was found in, respectively, 71% (17/24) and 61% (14/23). Concordance in drainage to 45 lymph node basins was 91%. Discordant drainage was found for two melanomas in the head-and-neck and one in the clavicular area. Unique lymph node basins were seen in 44/45 (98%) for ICG-Tc-nanocolloid and 42/45 (93%) for Tc-Senti-Scint. Concerning identified SLNs, the number was similar for both tracers (n = 58); however, more non-SLNs (65 vs 50) were visualized with ICG-Tc-nanocolloid than with Tc-Senti-Scint. CONCLUSION: A slightly higher SLN visualization accompanied by a tendency to depict more non-SLNs was found for ICG-Tc-nanocolloid. Excepting the head and neck area, an overall high concordance in drainage was found for both radiotracers. With an additional value for the hybrid tracer due to the combination of preoperative imaging and the additional visual signal in the operation room, added by the fluorescent component of the hybrid tracer, there was a preference for ICG-Tc-nanocolloid.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]