These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Early, late, or no shunt embolization in patients with cirrhosis- and portosystemic shunt-related hepatic encephalopathy.
    Author: Philips CA, Rajesh S, George T, Ahamed R, Mohanan M, Augustine P.
    Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol; 2020 Aug; 39(4):377-387. PubMed ID: 32929684.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Portosystemic shunts (PSS) are associated with recurrent or persistent hepatic encephalopathy (HE), severe portal hypertensive (PHT) complications, and poor survival in cirrhosis patients. Shunt embolization improves HE in patients with recurrent or persistent HE. The role of early shunt embolization (ESE) in comparison with no and late SE (LSE) in cirrhosis patients with PSS and associated clinical outcomes are not studied. METHODS: ESE was defined as occlusion of PSS in patients with the first episode of spontaneous HE, while LSE was that when performed in patients with recurrent/persistent PSS-related HE. We retrospectively analyzed (November 2016 to March 2019) clinical outcomes, liver disease severity, and survival between patients undergoing ESE (n = 22) vs. LSE (n = 23) and compared ESE with matched historical controls (n = 22) not undergoing shunt embolization, followed-up for 18 months. RESULTS: Males predominated, and the lienorenal type of shunt was the most frequent. Significantly larger and multiple shunts were noted in the LSE group. Arterial ammonia, total bilirubin, and Child-Pugh scores were significantly higher at baseline in the LSE group. Post-procedure length of stay in the intensive unit (mean 0.6 vs. 2.1 days; p = 0.04), infections (31.8% vs. 66.7% beyond 100 days; p = 0.02), recurrence of HE in first 9 months (4.5% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.03), and liver- and PHT-related clinical events beyond 10 months were significantly higher in LSE compared with those in the ESE group respectively. HE beyond 10 months was comparable between both the groups. 18.2% died in ESE while 60.87% died in the LSE group (p = 0.002). Compared with patients on only standard medical care, the occurrence of ascites, variceal bleeding, recurrence of HE, and portal vein thrombosis were significantly lower in those undergoing ESE, even though differences in survival were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the benefits of ESE of large PSS in patients with cirrhosis, probably by improving survival through a reduction in liver and PHT events that warrant validation through prospective randomized controlled multicenter trials.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]