These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: High prevalence of subtle systolic and diastolic dysfunction in genotype-positive phenotype-negative relatives of dilated cardiomyopathy patients.
    Author: Paldino A, De Angelis G, Dal Ferro M, Faganello G, Porcari A, Barbati G, Korcova R, Gentile P, Artico J, Cannatà A, Gigli M, Pinamonti B, Merlo M, Sinagra G.
    Journal: Int J Cardiol; 2021 Feb 01; 324():108-114. PubMed ID: 32949639.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The early diagnosis of genetically determined dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) could improve the prognosis in mutation carriers. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) and peak left atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) are promising techniques for the detection of subtle systolic and diastolic dysfunction. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of subtle systolic and diastolic dysfunction by LV GLS and PALS in a cohort of genotype-positive phenotype-negative (GPFN) DCM relatives. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed echocardiograms of forty-one GPFN relatives of DCM patients. They were compared with age and sex matched healthy individuals (control group). Reduced LV GLS and PALS were defined as >18% and <23.1%, respectively. GPFN relatives (37 ± 14 years, 48.8% male) and controls were similar according to standard echocardiographic measurements. Conversely, LV GLS was -18.8 ± 2.7% in the GPFN group vs. -24.0 ± 1.8% in the control group (p < 0.001). Twenty subjects (48.8%) in the GPFN group and no subjects in the control group had a reduced LV GLS. PALS was 29.2 ± 6.7% in the GPFN group vs. 40.8 ± 8.5% in the control group (p < 0.001). Seven subjects (18.4%) in the GPFN group and one (2%) in the control group had a reduced PALS. A cohort of 17 genotype-negative phenotype-negative relatives showed higher values of LV GLS compared to GPFN. CONCLUSIONS: Despite standard echocardiographic parameters are within the normal range, LV GLS and PALS are lower in GPFN relatives of DCM patients when compared to healthy individuals, suggesting a consistent proportion of subtle systolic and diastolic dysfunction in this population.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]