These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparative study on effect of electroacupuncture at lower he-sea point of stomach and he-sea matching front-mu points for gastroparesis].
    Author: Zhou Y, Ma HQ, Yang ZJ, Shao HT, Yue GL, Du GZ.
    Journal: Zhongguo Zhen Jiu; 2020 Sep 12; 40(9):925-7. PubMed ID: 32959584.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy difference of electroacupuncture at lower he-sea point and he-sea matching front-mu points for the treatment of gastroparesis. METHODS: A total of 63 patients with gastroparesis were randomly divided into a lower he point group (group A, 32 cases, 2 cases dropped off) and a he matching mu points group (group B, 31 cases, 1 case dropped off). The group A was treated with electroacupuncture at Zusanli (ST 36), and the group B was treated with electroacupuncture at Zusanli (ST 36) and Zhongwan (CV 12). Both groups were treated with continuous wave (2 Hz in frequency) for 30 min, once a day, 5 times a week for 3 weeks. The gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) score, gastric half-emptying time (T1/2) and the 180 min gastric residual rate of the two groups before and after treatment were observed, and the clinical effective rate was compared. RESULTS: After treatment, the total GCSI scores, T1/2 and the 180 min gastric residual rates in both groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.01), and the 180 min gastric residual rate and T1/2 in the group A were lower than those in the group B (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 93.3% (28/30) in the group A, which was superior to 70.0% (21/30) in the group B (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Electroacupuncture at lower he-sea point and he-sea matching front-mu points can both be used to treat gastroparesis, but electroacupuncture at Zusanli (ST 36) has a better effect. The acupoints of Zusanli (ST 36) and Zhongwan (CV 12) may have antagonistic effects. 目的：探究电针胃下合穴与合募配伍治疗胃轻瘫的疗效差异。方法：将63例胃轻瘫患者随机分为下合穴组（32例，脱落2例）和合募配伍组（31例，脱落1例）。下合穴组仅电针足三里，合募配伍组电针足三里、中脘，两组均选用连续波，频率2 Hz，留针30 min，每日1次，每周5次，连续治疗3周。比较两组患者治疗前后胃轻瘫主要症状指数（GCSI）量表总评分、胃半排空时间（T1/2）、180 min胃残留率及临床总有效率。结果：治疗后两组GCSI量表总评分、180 min胃残留率均较治疗前降低，T1/2均较治疗前缩短（P<0.01）；治疗后下合穴组180 min胃残留率低于合募配伍组，T1/2短于合募配伍组（P<0.05）。下合穴组总有效率为93.3%（28/30），优于合募配伍组的70.0%（21/30，P<0.05）。结论：电针胃下合穴与合募配伍均可治疗胃轻瘫，但电针足三里疗效更佳，中脘与足三里配伍可能具有相互拮抗作用。.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]