These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A comparison of measurement properties between UK SF-6D and English EQ-5D-5L and Thai EQ-5D-5L value sets in general Thai population. Author: Kangwanrattanakul K. Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Aug; 21(4):765-774. PubMed ID: 32981380. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited for comparative psychometric properties between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D. Therefore, this study compared psychometric properties between those instruments using value sets from Thailand, England, and the UK in the general Thai population. METHODS: A total of 1,200 participants were recruited. The agreement level was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. Convergent validity with SF-12v2 was assessed by Spearman's rho correlations. Known-group validity compared discriminant activity and sensitivity between groups. Responsiveness was assessed using standardized effect sizes (SES) and standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: Agreement between SF-6D and Thai (ICCs = 0.51) and English (ICCs = 0.52) EQ-5D-5L index scores was good. The physical functioning demonstrated moderate to strong and moderate correlations with Thai (r = 0.50) and English (r = 0.46) EQ-5D-5L index scores, whereas SF-6D index scores strongly correlated with role emotion (r = 0.81). EQ-5D-5L was better than SF-6D at discrimination and sensitivity for gender, age, education level, household income, and number of diseases. The SF-6D was more responsive than the EQ-5D-5L for the worsened group. CONCLUSION: Both SF-6D and EQ-5D-5L are valid among the general Thai population. Further studies should reinvestigate responsiveness and determine their impacts on economic analyses among patient groups.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]