These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Treatment of high-strength sewage by textile fibers-based sequencing batch biofilm reactor for simultaneous removal of organics and nutrients.
    Author: Sowndarya S, Kanmani S, Raj SA.
    Journal: J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2020; 55(13):1548-1562. PubMed ID: 32990175.
    Abstract:
    This study investigates the effectiveness of SBBR with low-cost textile fibers-based bio-carrier namely polypropylene fibers for the treatment of real sewage. The influent loading rates of COD, TN, and TP were averaged at 0.2780, 0.0170, and 0.0077 kg/m3.d, respectively. The removal efficiencies of BOD, COD, TN, and TP recorded in SBBR were 98%, 93%, 82%, and 44%, respectively at an aeration time of 4 h. The TN and TP removal achieved in SBBR were 2.05 and 2.75 times, respectively higher than SBR. The COD removal efficiency was more than 90% under all SRT conditions (10, 14, 18, 22, and 26 d) in SBBR, and the highest efficiency of 93% was obtained at an SRT of 22 days. As the SRT increased, the nitrogen and phosphorus removal decreased, because the denitrification rate and phosphorus release and uptake rate decreased at longer SRT. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) efficiency was 85% in SBBR and 44% in SBR, indicating the co-existence of aerobic nitrifiers and anoxic denitrifiers in the biofilm reactor. In SBBR, the nitrogen mass balance showed 74% of nitrogen removed by denitrification, 9% was removed through sludge wasting process, and 13% was removed in effluent at an SRT of 22 days and DO concentration of 3 mg/L. The t-test results suggest that the performance of SBBR was better than SBR in nitrogen and phosphorus removal at a 95% confidence interval.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]