These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Morphologic and Functional Dual-Energy CT Parameters in Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension and Chronic Thromboembolic Disease.
    Author: Saeedan MB, Bullen J, Heresi GA, Rizk A, Karim W, Renapurkar RD.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Dec; 215(6):1335-1341. PubMed ID: 32991219.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare morphologic and functional dual-energy CT (DECT) parameters in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Using the local CTEPH registry, we identified 28 patients with CTED and 72 patients with CTEPH. On each DECT examination, a clot burden score was calculated by assigning the following scores for chronic changes by location: pulmonary trunk, 5; each main pulmonary artery (MPA), 4; each lobar branch, 3; each segmental branch, 2; and each subsegmental branch, 1. The total clot burden score was calculated by adding the individual scores from both lungs. Functional parameters were assessed using perfused blood volume (PBV) maps and included lung enhancement (in Hounsfield units), percentage of PBV, MPA peak enhancement (in Hounsfield units), maximum enhancement corresponding to 100, and the ratio of MPA peak enhancement to lung enhancement. A perfusion defect (PD) score was calculated by assigning 1 point to each segmental PD. Patients with CTED and patients with CTEPH were matched using propensity score matching to account for potential confounders. RESULTS. After matching, the CTEPH group showed a higher PD score than the CTED group and unilateral disease was more common in the CTED group than in the CTEPH group. In the unmatched sample, patients with CTED showed increased percentages of PBV for both lungs (PBV total) and for the right lung as compared with the CTEPH group (adjusted p = 0.040 and 0.028, respectively); after adjustment for clot burden, the difference between groups was still noted but was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were noted in the various functional DECT parameters after propensity score matching. CONCLUSION. Patients with CTED show anatomic and functional changes in the pulmonary vasculature and lung parenchyma similar to those seen in patients with CTEPH. Functional DECT parameters support the observation that CTED is an intermediate clinical phenotype in the population with chronic pulmonary embolism.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]