These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic and gastrointestinal biotransformation rates of hydrophobic chemicals in rainbow trout.
    Author: Saunders LJ, Fitzsimmons PN, Nichols JW, Gobas FAPC.
    Journal: Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Nov; 228():105629. PubMed ID: 33002683.
    Abstract:
    Hepatic in vitro biotransformation assays, in combination with in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) and bioaccumulation modeling, can be used to support regulatory bioaccumulation assessments. In most applications, however, these methods ignore the possibility of extrahepatic metabolism. Here we evaluated intestinal biotransformation in rainbow trout using S9 fractions prepared from the upper intestinal (GIT) epithelium. Measured levels of activity determined using standard substrates for phase I and phase II biotransformation enzymes were within 2-fold of activities measured in hepatic S9 fractions. In vitro intrinsic clearance rates for 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC; an organic sunscreen agent) and two polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pyrene [PYR] and benzo(a)pyrene [BAP]) were significantly higher in liver S9 fractions than in GIT S9 fractions. For octocrylene (OCT; a second sunscreen agent), however, in vitro intrinsic clearance rates were higher in GIT S9 fractions compared to liver S9 fractions. An existing 'liver only' IVIVE model was expanded to consider biotransformation in both the liver and GIT. Relevant IVIVE scaling factors were developed by morphological, histological, and biochemical evaluation of trout intestines. For chemicals biotransformed at higher rates by hepatic S9 fractions (i.e., BAP, PYR, EHMC), the 'liver & GIT' model yielded whole-body biotransformation rate constants (kMET) that were within 1.2 to 1.4-fold of those estimated using the 'liver only' model. In contrast to these findings, the mean kMET for OCT obtained using the 'liver & GIT' model was 3.3 times higher than the mean kMET derived using the 'liver only' model and was in good agreement with empirical kMET estimates determined previously for trout (<20 % difference). The results of this study suggest that current 'liver only' IVIVE approaches may underestimate in vivo biotransformation rates for chemicals that undergo substantial biotransformation in the GIT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]