These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of Surrogate Tests for the Presence of mecA-Mediated Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus hominis, and Staphylococcus warneri.
    Author: Humphries RM, Magnano P, Burnham CA, Dien Bard J, Dingle TC, Callan K, Westblade LF.
    Journal: J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Dec 17; 59(1):. PubMed ID: 33115842.
    Abstract:
    Testing of staphylococci other than Staphylococcus aureus (SOSA) for mecA-mediated resistance is challenging. Isolates of Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus hominis, and Staphylococcus warneri were evaluated by cefoxitin and oxacillin broth microdilution (BMD), disk diffusion (DD), and PBP2a immunoassay, and the results were compared to mecA PCR results. No phenotypic susceptibility test correlated well with PCR results across all species, although the PBP2a immunoassay yielded 100% correlation. Oxacillin BMD testing by current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) SOSA breakpoints led to 2.1% very major errors (VMEs) and 7.1% major errors (ME). Adjusting this breakpoint up by a dilution (susceptible, ≤0.5 μg/ml; resistant, ≥1.0 μg/ml) led to 2.8% VMEs and 0.3% MEs. Among species evaluated, S. haemolyticus had unacceptable VMEs with this new breakpoint (6.4%), as did S. hominis (4.0%). MEs were acceptable by this new breakpoint, ranging from 0 to 1.2%. Oxacillin DD yielded high ME rates (20.7 to 21.7%) using CLSI or European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. VMEs ranged from 0 to 5.3%. Cefoxitin BMD led to 4.9% VMEs and 1.6% MEs. Cefoxitin DD performed best when interpreted with the CLSI SOSA breakpoint, with 1.0% VMEs and 2.9% MEs. This study led CLSI to adjust the oxacillin MIC breakpoints for SOSA. Laboratories should be aware that no individual phenotypic test correlates well across all species of SOSA with mecA PCR results. Molecular testing for mecA or evaluation for PBP2a is the preferred approach.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]