These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Effects of Occupational stress and related factors on life satisfaction level of workers in electronic manufacturing industry].
    Author: Yang XY, Li P, Wang X, Liu J, Zeng Q.
    Journal: Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Oct 20; 38(10):742-745. PubMed ID: 33142376.
    Abstract:
    Objective: To investigate the influence of life satisfaction level and occupational stress related influencing factors on workers in chip manufacturing industry in order to provide guidance for psychological intervention. Methods: In June to December 2016, by using sampling method, 2251workers in electronic manufacturing industry were selected as study subjects. A self-made questionnaire was used to investigate the demographic and occupational data of workers, Job Demand-Control Model (JDC) 、Effort-reword Imbalance Model (ERI) 、Well-being Index (WHO-5) were used to investigate and analyze the status of life satisfaction respctively. To analyze the influence of occupational stress factors on life satisfaction. Results: There were 773 workers with low life satifaction, the detect rate was 34.5% (773/2251) . Single factor analysis showed that migrant workers, type of employment contract, week working time (h) , working system, contact risk factors, chronic disease and all occupational stress related factors were the influcecing factors of life satisfaction among workers (P<0.05) . The results of multiple factor logistic regression analysis showed that contact risk factors, high effort in work and high effort inner work were the risk factors of low life satisfaction in electronic device manufacturers (OR=1.544, 1.376, 1.788, P<0.05) . And non-migrant workers, high return in work, high autonomy and high social support were the protective factors of low life satisfaction in electronic device workers (OR=0.606, 0.390, 0.615, 0.622, P<0.05) . Conclusion: Enterprises should strengthen the protection education of hazard factors for employees, those who contact hazard factors and high effort in work, improve worker's returns and autonomy, improve their social support, improve workers' life satisfaction, and build healthy enterprises. 目的： 调查电子器件制造员工生活满意度现况，并分析职业应激对其的影响，为实施企业员工心理健康干预提供基础性资料。 方法： 2016年6至12月采用整群抽样的方法，以电子器件制造企业员工2 251名作为调查对象，调查员工的人口学资料、职业相关资料，并采用简明工作要求-自主模型（job demcond-control model，JDC）、付出-回报失衡模型（effort-reward imbanlance model，ERI）问卷、生活满意度量表（well-being index，WHO-5）调查员工生活满意度，分析员工生活满意度现况以及JDC、ERI职业应激各因子对其的影响。 结果： 调查对象中生活满意度低者773名，检出率34.3%（773/2 251）。是否外来务工、用工合同类型、周工作时间（h）、工作制、是否接触危害因素、患慢性疾病和所有职业应激因子水平组间低生活满意度检出率差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。接触危害因素、工作付出高和工作内在投入高为电子器件制造员工低生活满意度的危险因素（OR=1.544、1.376、1.788，P<0.05）。非外来务工、工作回报高、自主程度高和社会支持高为电子器件制造员工低生活满意度的保护因素（OR=0.606、0.390、0.615、0.622，P<0.05）。 结论： 企业对员工加强危害因素防护教育，重视接触危害因素、工作付出高的员工，提高工作回报、自主性和员工社会支持，提高员工生活满意度，建设健康企业。.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]