These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Antitumor activity, multitarget mechanisms, and molecular docking studies of quinazoline derivatives based on a benzenesulfonamide scaffold: Cell cycle analysis. Author: El-Azab AS, Abdel-Aziz AA, AlSaif NA, Alkahtani HM, Alanazi MM, Obaidullah AJ, Eskandrani RO, Alharbi A. Journal: Bioorg Chem; 2020 Nov; 104():104345. PubMed ID: 33142413. Abstract: The in vitro cytotoxicity of some substituted quinazolinones, 1-15, was evaluated using NCI (10 µM) in a full NCI 59-cell line panel assay. Relative to the reference drug, imatinib (PCE = 20/59), compounds 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 exhibited remarkable antitumor activity against the tested cell lines, with positive cytotoxic effects (PCE) of 29/59, 18/59, 17/59, 44/59, and 24/59 respectively. Enzymatic inhibitory assay conducted on 3, 4, 9, and 10 as the most potent antitumor agents against EGFR, HER2 and CDK9 kinases, and COX-2 enzyme. Compound 3 possessed good COX-2 inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.775 μM) compared to the reference drug, celecoxib (IC50 = 0.153 μM). Compounds 4 and 9 were closely potent to the reference compounds against EGFR and (HER2) tyrosine kinases, with IC50 values of 90.17 (and 131.39 for HER2) for 4 and 145.35 (and 129.07 for HER2) nM for 9; the reference drugs in this case, namely, gefitinib and erlotinib, exhibited IC50 values of 55.58 (90) and 110 (79.28) nM against the EGFR and (HER2) tyrosine kinases, respectively. Compound 4 was approximately similar potent against CDK9 kinase (IC50 = 67.04 nM) like the reference compound, dinaciclib (IC50 = 53.12 nM). Compound 9 induced cytotoxicity in the MCF-7 cell line (GI % at 10.0 μM = 47%) through pre-G1 apoptosis, thereby inhibiting cell growth at the G2/M phase. Molecular docking models of 3 and 4 with COX-2, EGFR, and CDK9 were conducted to determine their binding mode within the putative binding pockets.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]