These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Correction of slope-intercept glomerular filtration rate measurement without scaling for body size.
    Author: McMeekin H, Burniston MT, Barnfield M, Peters AM.
    Journal: Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jan; 42(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 33165257.
    Abstract:
    AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate a slope-intercept glomerular filtration rate (GFR) one-compartment correction method based exclusively on the rate constant (α2) of the exponential between 2 and 4 h post-injection that requires no scaling for BSA. METHODS: The correction factor is 1/([C.α2]+1). C depends on the difference between one-compartment-corrected and uncorrected GFR, so varies with different correction procedures. Patients were in four groups: group 1 (Cr-EDTA; n = 141) and group 2 (Tc-DTPA; n = 47) had sampling at 2, 3 and 4 h. Groups 3A (Tc-DTPA; n = 168) and 3B (Tc-DTPA; n = 361) gave nine samples up to 480 min. C was calculated from GFR corrected using Brochner-Mortensen (BM) without prior BSA-scaling (CBM; GFRBM), after BSA-scaling then reverse-scaling as per British Nuclear Medicine Society (BNMS) guidelines (CBNMS; GFRBNMS), and after correction using the equations containing 'f' described by Fleming (CFlem; GFRFlem) and Jodal and Brochner-Mortensen (CJBM; GFRJBM). In group 3A, C (C9) was determined from GFR measured from all nine samples (GFR9) and from seven samples (C7) up to 240 min. In 3B, GFRC, corrected using 1/([C9.α2]+1), was compared with GFRBM, GFRBNMS, GFRFlem and GFRJBM against GFR9 (gold-standard). RESULTS: C derived from these one-compartment correction formulae ranged from 25 to 32 min. In group 3, C7 and C9 were 28 ± 11 and 38 ± 14 min (P < 0.0001). Biases of GFRBM, GFRBNMS, GFRJBM, GFRFlem and GFRC against GFR9 were 2.7, 1.5, 4.2, 3.4 and 0.4 ml/min. Corresponding precisions were 9.3, 7.3, 7.0, 6.7 and 7.6 ml/min. CONCLUSION: Correction using α2 avoids BSA scaling, has a low bias against gold-standard GFR and does not over-correct at high GFR.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]