These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical and Surgical Outcome of a Supplementary Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implanted with a Bag-In-the-Lens Intraocular Lens: 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Author: Verdonck T, Werner L, Ní Dhubhghaill S, Tassignon MJ.
    Journal: Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(3):503-511. PubMed ID: 33326968.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: To assess the postoperative outcome and patient-reported satisfaction, spectacle independence, and dysphotopsia after implantation with the mutifocal Rayner Sulcoflex supplementary intraocular lens (sIOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the outcome of all patients implanted with a multifocal sIOL between 2009 and 2011. In all cases, the sIOL was the Rayner Sulcoflex IOL (type 653F) and the primary IOL was a bag-in-the-lens (BIL) IOL. The data were obtained through a retrospective analysis of the patient records and by means of a questionnaire, 5 years after sIOL implantation. RESULTS: This study included 31 eyes of 20 patients. In 13 eyes, the sIOL needed explantation (n = 13, 41.94%). Dysphotopsia is a frequent complaint (12/15 patients: 80.0%) after sIOL implantation. In 13 out of 31 eyes (41.94%), pigment deposits were found on the sIOL with variable clinical complaints. Five eyes required additional surgery because of clinically significant deposits. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Patients with a multifocal sIOL in combination with a BIL implantation have a higher incidence of dysphotopsia compared to previously published studies. Dysphotopsia was the main complaint and reason for explantation. We encountered a high incidence of pigmented IOL deposits. The sIOLs can be safely removed even years after implantation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]